On July 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> why does BBDB (2.34) add the MID to the Reply-To-field and then even in
> a broken format with stripping the "M"?
Can you check the CVS version (2.35) to see if this is still a problem?
> I think this happens only when a certain user who is in my BBDB sends
> a mail to me. His MID-headers always look like this
>
> "Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>
> and I believe he is using "The Bat" as MUA.
It would also help if you can provide a mail that triggers this
behaviour - obviously, you can remove any identifying information and
the entire message body. Just the headers should be sufficient. Make
it a MIME attachment so that any oddball whitespace gets preserved,
too.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
"Love wouldn't be blind if the braille wasn't so damned much fun."
- Armistead Maupin
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
