Evil Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ;; iso-2022-7bit should be OK (but not optimal for Emacs, at least -- >> ;; emacs-mule would be better) with both Emacs 21 and XEmacs. Emacs >> ;; 22 will really need utf-8-emacs. > > Please change the comment, at least :) --- the current CVS Emacs is > going to be 22.1 and it's NOT Unicode Emacs. It DOES have mule-utf-8 > encoding in it. Hence the code below breaks things in current CVS > Emacs, as mule-utf-8 is a legal encoding and the file switches from > iso-2022-7bit to mule-utf-8 silently. Hmmm... **I** am using CVS > Emacs and I still have iso-2022-7bit as the encoding of .bbdb. Oh, I > see. I did not bother updating BBDB for a while. On the other hand, > the date stamp seems to be Mar 19. !?!?!?
I am running GNU Emacs 22.0.50.26 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, Motif Version 2.2.2) of 2005-08-11 and a current cvs BBDB. However, I have: ,----[database] | ;; -*-coding: emacs-mule;-*- | ;;; file-version: 6 `---- Greetings, Jochen -- Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité GnuPG key: CC1B0B4D (Part 3 you find in my messages before fall 2003.) ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
