On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:27:52 +0100, Uday S Reddy <u.s.re...@cs.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 8/20/2010 9:05 PM, Seb wrote: >> Thanks Uday. I think I'll have to set `bbdb-always-add-addresses' to >> some function to test whether the email to be added is not one of the >> mangled ones like<dav...@qimr.edu.au>. > You could, but it doesn't sound easy. My reasoning was that I would > block BBDB from overwriting good addresses in the database with > bad/mangled ones. In the rare case that I want to send a message to > some one that has a mangled address in the database, I would probably > notice it when I do completion on the "To" header. It may be easier than I thought. All that should be needed is to locally set `bbdb-always-add-addresses' to nil in the offending group by setting it as a group parameter (variables have values local to the group with this). Unfortunately it seems as if BBDB only checks the global value, as I'm still asked whether to add the new addresses even though the local value is nil. -- Seb ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
