rene <jl...@yahoo.com> writes:

> Roland Winkler <winkler <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> On Sun Aug 31 2014 Rene wrote:
>> > When using "*M-x bbdb-print" or even "M-x bbdb-print" I only get a TeX file
>> > containing the current displayed record (the one my pointer is on in the
>> > *BBDB* buffer).
>> 
>> All these commands use the prefix `*', see the docstring of bbdb-print.
>
> Strange thing.  The prefix `*' (bbdb-do-all-records) works alright for
> commands like "*t" or "*m".
>
> On the other hand, the prefix doesn't seem to be working with "*M-x
> bbdb-print".  I keep getting a TeX file holding only the record my pointer
> is on.
>
> How is that possible?
> Any idea about how to fix that?

I don't think the "*" prefix works if you're using M-x to call a
command. Maybe try binding `bbdb-print' to a key, then using the "*"
prefix with that key?

Eric


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to