On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Neil Faiman <neil.goo...@faiman.org> wrote: > Even better, yje persistent include doesn't have to be plain HTML -- it can > be a script (shell script, AppleScript, Perl, Ruby, or Python) that will > *generate* the included HTML.
This is a little off-topic, but that brings up something I've been wondering about. I use scripted clientside includes with BBEdit 9.6.3 running in Snow Leopard. However, the scripting language is JavaScript -- not mentioned in your list above. This relies on the ancient JS/OSA library from Late Night Software that AFAIK they abandoned years ago -- but it still works for me. (Very awkward to edit, however, since the version of AppleScript Editor I have, which is needed to compile the scripts, barely works with JS anymore.) Anyway, my question: If I were to upgrade to the latest version of BBEdit, would the LNS library and my JS includes still work? How about if I moved to Mountain Lion? (The latter is unlikely, since I prefer Snow Leopard, but I'm still curious.) If my JS includes are totally orphaned (i.e. prevent me from ever upgrading BBEdit again) then I've been thinking about transmogrifying them into PHP server-side includes, but that would be a bit of work since my PHP skills are a lot weaker than my JS skills. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at <http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
