On Jan 30, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Larry Finger wrote: > Francesco Gringoli wrote: > >> - have you applied any recent patch to the kernel (we too are using >> 2.6.29-rc2-wl), so that your kernel can behave differently than ours? >> - are you sure you are using the correct initvals files? Those we put >> today on the website? >> - have you replaced _all_ the files, including shm.inc etc? Here we >> redefined the txheader layout and moved the cookie address >> - are you modprobing by setting qos=0? >> - is your card a PCCARD or PCI? > > The only patch I had applied to 2.6.29-rc2-wl was to have b43 look for > opensource firmware before the proprietary version. The complete set I still did not have time to integrate this patch, I will try it tomorrow.
> of files from the openfwwf-5.1.tar.gz were applied and the firmware > built from them. I am modprobing with qos=0 and nohwcrypto=1. I have a Perfect. > PCCARD format. It is labeled as a Linksys WPC54G, ver. 3. Ah... well, although Lorenzo did lot of this work using his 4318 PCCARD branded Belkin, I observed very bizarre behavior when using PCCARD in the past, independently of the firmware type (also with the original Broadcom one), to such point that I gave up and switched to PCI and PCI-express only testbeds. However I will give a try tomorrow, I'm curious now to see what happens with new kernel + r5.1 + PCCARD. >> [cut] >> when you want, in this case just after the SIFS and only for frames >> sent >> to one not existing MAC addresses, so that no ack is sent by no one). >> Actual packets transmission verified by sniffing the channel by using >> another Broadcom card > > Your tests are a lot more rigorous than mine. > > I'll repeat my tests. > > Larry Many thanks, Cheers -FG _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev