James, For sure dowsing is a big help.
Best, Hugh >Dear Hugh, >Both Lloyd and I have found that the mixtures of reagents can change from >day to day, let alone from year to year. As for dowsing it is an easily >learnt skill as the participants at our dowsing workshops at "Sattwa Park" >can testify to. >How any body can use a field broadcaster without dowsing skills is beyond my >comprehension >Sincere regards >James. >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Hugh Lovel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:01 PM >Subject: Re: Agri-Synthesis® short-lived and overpriced? was Re: >Agri-Synthesis® Remedies Tested At UAI > > >> Dear Glen, et. al., >> >> Your post confirms what Lorraine has found. "Mixes are often specific for >> the situation, time and weather circumstance." >> >> That's why we tailor our broadcaster reagents to each and every farm. And >> change them at a minimum of every year. So what we have found is the >> expertise rather than copying of remedies is the important thing. One has >> to be able to tell (Lorraine does this by dowsing) what potency of each >> remedy she puts on the reagent vials for our broadcasters. Commonly one >> farm is quite different from another. >> >> Best, >> Hugh >> >> >> >> >> >Hugh, Alan, Gil and Chris >> >Thank you for your thoughts and suggestions. I see the value in Hugh and >> >Alans approaches and will work with them and see what I can do with >> >them. >> >Gils comments on 'unknowing messing around' are true to a point however >> >dowsing and a radionics box could do some wild things. The uniqueness I >> >see is in the original mixing for a specific task. >> >This was a question that needed to be asked publically for the community >> >to consider. >> >While I have made general mixes of things, with our 'personal clients' >> >the mixes are most often specific for the situation, time and weather >> >circumstance. These would be silly to generally copy. >> >I am sure there is a way forward, just in a different direction to that >> >already travelled and that imagined to be travelled. Sounds like another >> >bit of 'life' taking place. >> >cheers >> >Glen >> > >> > >> >Chris Shade wrote: >> >> >> >> Glen has a good point, and frankly, I was surprised >> >> that Allan so openly suggested that. >> >> >> >> On the flip side, though, most people (who dont' >> >> already make some of their own preps), won't be in a >> >> position to make good copies of Glen and Greg's >> >> potencies. And if radionic theft is the issue, it >> >> would have always been the issue with any prep. You >> >> just have to figure that your market is those who >> >> aren't radionics or homeophath jockeys and who need >> >> some good preps. >> >> >> >> Wishing you market protection and good will from your >> >> community, >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> --- Glen Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Allan Balliett wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > A question I have for everyone is "Can't Greg's >> >> > remedies be readily >> >> > > propagated infinitely?" Since they are potentized, >> >> > are they not now >> >> > > the 'mother' for endless batches of equal remedy? >> >> > I would think they >> >> > > are, but I'd appreciate insights from you more >> >> > experienced >> >> > > potentizers. Myself, I assume that once you buy a >> >> > unit from Greg, if >> >> > > you don't spill it, you need never purchase >> >> > another, but simply dose >> >> > > your own units from that point on. >> >> > >> >> > This does not necessarily hold to be true. Firstly >> >> > these are compounds >> >> > which when further potentised can change their >> >> > effectiveness and >> >> > secondly potentising develops in waves and so >> >> > further potentising can >> >> > indeed make them less effective. We have definitely >> >> > found that reducing >> >> > the desired application rate leads to reduced >> >> > effect. 'Stealing them' >> >> > thru a radionics device, without changing the >> >> > potency should work within >> >> > that sphere I guess. >> >> > >> >> > This is an opportune moment to bring a thought to >> >> > this discussion. With >> >> > Greg and my potencies ( and thus our lives work) >> >> > being 'potentially' so >> >> > easily stolen from us, what incentive is there for >> >> > us to continue >> >> > working on furthering preparation applications. Why >> >> > would we bother? and >> >> > how are our overheads and life expenses to be >> >> > covered by the community >> >> > benefiting so freely from our work? >> >> > in anticipation of the solution >> >> > Glen >> >> > >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> >> Do You Yahoo!? >> >> Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games >> >> http://sports.yahoo.com >> > >> >-- >> >Garuda Biodynamics - for BD Preps, Consultations, Books & Diagrams >> >See our web site @ http://get.to/garuda >> >>
