|
Below comes from Steiner's Agriculture Lectures; and yes
I had to loosely translate from my French book...,
Here I refer to stirring preps:
Steiner explains how 'Enthusiasm brings forth therapeutic
effect". In German it comes from "Enthusiasmus and
Begeisterung". How then to decide what is appropriate
'enthusiasms?. He adds that although enthusiasm weighs nothings it has
vibrations and that enthusiastic people can even have spiritual
vibrations. He also tells us that 'homogeneity must be attained'
(What I understand is that organic content must be rendered colloidal...).
Then he talks about Ritter medications and some experiments that I don't know
about...?
Then, personally, I was taught to use a wooden ( I think it
was willow) stick, hand chosen, to stir rain water in a wooden
barrel. To stir with good intent! I don't remember any
particular length, although, some preps needed to be sprayed early morning,
so stirring was often the first thing I did after breakfast. I wonder
about acid rain used as rain water? Oh well...
Cheers,
Robin
----- Original Message -----
Sent: July 21, 2002 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: BD 501 (5x)
Dear Allan,
This is SO right. Stir as appropriate, not
as told by rote formula. For
years I have dowsed for how long to stir 500,
501, etc. and come up with
times like 45 minutes, 43 minutes,
whatever.
Let's not forget Greg Willis's rigid 60 minute rule. He
believed that, and
it was doubtless true for him even though he did the
best job of creating
vortices in a barrel I've ever seen. But according to
the best I can tell
we can get high end results with less stirring of fewer
"perfect" vortices,
which is not to say we will match Greg--who claims he
is going to sue me
for "stealing" his horn clay. He's still a genius and a
good praticioner.
But in some areas Greg may be or rather probably is all
wet.
One of the variables we are working with is our thoughts influence
our
experiments. So do Greg's. Greg meditates every morning for at least
30
minutes so he really focuses his thinking. Probably that influences
his
results more strongly. More of us should do that.
In any event,
I simply dowse for the appropriate potentization time. If for
a
homeopathic, like this one we're talking about, my pendulum indicates
15
minutes, that's it. If it comes up 5 minutes that's it.
The
essence of control is to use the EXACT amount of force that is
neccessary,
no more and no less. Aren't we seeking control? We should think
about that.
Don't we want to be more exact?
Best,
Hugh
Lovel
>actually, I did ask Merlin. My impression was
that he said that the
>20minute stir listed on the pre-potentized stuff
was only there to
>make people who equate time with mass feel more
comfortable with the
>pre-potentized stuff. In actuality, as in any step
in potentization,
>it just needs a 2 minute
stir.
>
>Allan
Visit our website at: www.unionag.org
|
