dear fellow list members, i wish i could have taken the eco test, sorry
to say my computer got there , but then got stuck and so i couldn't even
take the test , a bit like my life i think... but i have found a horse
trainer or she found me , so maybe thats what counts here and we'll figure
out the computer later. . on another subject , i have a little reprint from
the steiner archives provided to me from our advisor on geology .(which is
the subject we are currently studying). So i was so startled to see the
author was Eugene Kolisko. I'm wrestling with the ideas and trying to
find a way to make it understandable to my12 year old much less myself! to
me it seems some beautiful thoughts that explain the tide of modern day
thought... it is just a few pages explaining geology, but i think out of"
agriculture for tomorrow". i think it has helped me get a handle on a
different perspective. , i just heard about a natural housing workshop in
ashville n.c. Does any one have experience trying to actually build earth
houses in the land of yuppy developments, is it possible ? (east COAST)
CONTACTme offline at mugwump @bwave.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Pye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: Eco-Footprints
> Lloyd Charles wrote:
>
> >Subject: Re: Eco-Footprints
> >
> >
> >>mroboz wrote:
> >>
> >>>In case anybody is intrested, I got a nice low Ecological Footprint
> >>>total of 4.92, well below the average for the US (and presumably
> >>>Canada). Michael
> >>>
> >I got 3.93 - figured I must have cheated so went back a couple more
times.
> >Initially I selected no running water - we provide our own not connected
to
> >any official supply (it falls on the roof - tank storage - comes out the
> >tap?) When I changed that one thing the score went up to 5.19 -I guess
that
> >says something about the cost of providing services to city residents!
> >Cheers
> >Lloyd Charles
> >
> >
> >
> Better believe it, mine is 5.17 :(
>
> roger
>
>
>
