First I want to say that 'the little wizard' in this case is myself. I came up with this procedure over a year ago but the opportunity to test it did not arise until December last. Though the results have been spectacular I would not describe the test as particularly scientific. My reason for putting it on the list was to see what reactions it would draw and given the argy-bargy that goes on here a lot I was not surprised when it hardly aroused a flicker of interest.
Insofar as anyone can 'own' a plant growth procedure, I claim ownership of this one. I say this here and now not so much for commercial reasons but because the list's archives are out in the public domain. For the time being, until further tests have been carried out under organised trial conditions (something I am working on now) and the results are apparent, I would prefer not to see anything in print. Or tried out without my knowledge. A reason for this is that should someone on or off the list try using 501 in this way and get negative or unwanted results, it could put them and a lot more people off using BD at all. Another is that the December test result could have been an aberration, something we can only determine by doing it again and again.
Yes, Liz, I will take the photos to Albury. I will also make them available on CD to anyone on this list for a reasonable processing charge plus post & packing, along with selected photos of the trial site taken on a continuous basis since November 2001. These include vegetation and terrain, vortex flowforms in operation, spraying operations, and striking images of the phenomenal grass growth happening now (during intense drought) along the groundwater lines and lakes I have dowsed over several months. Please contact me off-list about this.
Now to turn to what Liz said:
Without going far into what I said and didn't say ('burnt' was not in my message and is now not in my vocabulary at all), what I think happened is that the mixture used, in combination with energy from the sun, accelerated the growth of the plants beyond the point of seed viability. (Which is not the same as killing them; I'll come back to this in a moment.) The how and why of that and whether it could be done at other times of day can only be found out through doing more trials.Why 501? The way Roger explained the affect was that the grass was burnt quickly. Did this draw in more light, creating more heat and intensity? Which would also be reasoning for applying it in the heat of the day? Would it work any other time of day? If so would it be as quick as the heat of the day? Somehow I don't think it would be as intense, but then again I know nothing...I'd love to hear the reasoning behind your choice of 501, it can only help me to better understand the preps.
Why I chose 501? It wasn't exactly choice. Initially it was a third eye experience then I talked to the devas at Dalgety about it, they put the query up 'through channels' and the answer came 'down' that it was feasible and acceptable. This last is important, I feel. Personally I am not in the business of killing; in this house spiders and cockroaches and even large ants get put outside, not trodden on. Kill a plant with herbicide, forget the ads that say there's no residues, when it breaks down and goes into the soil it takes poison with it which can have adverse effects for a long time. Destroy a plant by fire and most of its energy is dissipated to the four winds, only a small proportion becomes re-usable ash.
Herbicide is a negative. The intent in using it is a negative. The holistic result after using it is a negative. Zero x zero x zero = zero.
Fire is ambivalent. In controlled situations it is a positive. Uncontrolled fire is a negative.
501 is a positive. The intent in using it is a positive. The sun is a positive. The beneficial effects go on and on and on. 2 x 2 x 2 = 8
One month after the event, the plants individually treated with 501 under this procedure appear to have reached their autumnal stage 3-4 months ahead of schedule. That is, the seed-bearing stems are yellowing to the creamy colour usual just before winter. The seeds have an appearance of insubstantiality. (Two independent tests are being conducted on seed germination.) The plants are still whole, however, and if they were to be slashed and incorporated into the soil they would carry with them 501 energy residues which would begin to release nutrients bound up in the soil . . .
. . . My God, it stands out like dogs' balls when you begin to think about it!!
Ahem - Pardon me
roger
Allan Balliett wrote:
Do it like this, ok folks? -AB
Why 501?
