Thanks Roger
Missed all that first time thru.
Most interesting and I will be interested to see how it works on other
plants.
What is your understanding of how 501 is doing this other than the burn off
effect?
GA


----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Pye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: BD501 as a Weed Control


> Glen wrote:
>
> >Roger
> >Please forgive my lack of attention on this.
> >I have looked thru the archive and can not find the post that you
outlined
> >what you have done and what you achieved.
> >As a researcher in this field, we have done several trials of 501 as a
weed
> >control as early as 1990.
> >I would be most interested in the details of what you are claiming to ''
> >own'.
> >
>
> All I am claiming ownership of is a procedure I conceived a year ago and
> tested last month.The original reference was in my post 'Re: Perfect
> Orchard - Calcium' of 23 Dec 02 in which I responded to Allan about use
> of chemical fertilisers. In this I stated in relation to 501:
>
> > I don't hold with everything that Rachel Carson or Tom Hartmann wrote,
> > or for that matter Rudolph Steiner. But I do know that 3.8 grams of
> > BD501 mixed with 34 litres of fresh water and potentised, and sprayed
> > on one hectare of degraded farmland in the evening when the land is
> > drawing its nutrients and energies back into itself, will unlock and
> > catalyse natural minerals and vitamins. (For the record, in my opinion
> > 3.8 grams IS a minute quantity.) The same mixture, sprayed on african
> > lovegrass in the heat of the day, renders the seed unviable. Instantly.
> >
> > 500, 501 and the other preparations are miracles-in-being whose
> > greatness, despite the passage of time, has in no way been fully
> > realised. Similarly we have hardly explored the energies available to
> > us naturally (and I don't mean fossil fuels). The opportunity to do so
> > - indeed, I feel I should say 'necessity'  - is upon us. From now
> > until the bombs start falling, and never mind that the time of year or
> > month is 'incorrect', make preparations for the future. After the last
> > desperate empirical doomed-to-failure grasp of the 'western' nations
> > at world supremacy is over, we will all be too busy chopping wood and
> > carrying water!
>
>
>  The details of the lovegrass test are in my post 'Perfect Orchard -
> Calcium' of 24 Dec 02:
>
> > Liquid 501 potentised by hedley & hedley & supplied in 20 to 1
> > concentration was mixed with african lovegrass pepper (potentised on
> > site by h&h in mid oct) & hand sprayed from a 15 litre clean backpack
> > unit directly on to one patch of seeding plants.
> >
> > Actual (ie powdered) 501 supplied by BACA a year ago was mixed with AL
> > pepper at proportionate rate (to match 3.8 grams to 34 litres),
> > stirred in recommended manner, sprayed from the same backpack in same
> > manner on a separate patch.
> >
> > Lovegrass was late growing and a healthy green with full seed.
> > Pendulum questioning indicated result would be instant and effects
> > visible within 15 minutes. We did not believe that was possible but it
> > was true. Have 'during' and 'after' photos in digital format but
> > unfortunately not 'before' (was going to take some of another patch,
> > untreated, but got too hot (me, that is.) Time of spray was mid
> > afternoon, temp about 33, place Dalgety TSR.
>
> The indications are that 501 mixed in a particular way and sprayed in
> the heat of the day has an adverse effect on african lovegrass. I am
> currently retesting and trialling on other plants.
>
> As far as other tests of 501 or any other BD preps as weed or plant
> controllers used as above are concerned, I have searched internet and
> print references extensively without finding anything on the subject.
> That being so, I am most interested in hearing the details of your own
> trials.
>
> Cheers Roger
>

Reply via email to