Allan, James and the list.
Continuing Allan's question on the difference between "News" in Australia and other countries.


I am trained in writing for the Media and for the past three years worked as a media analyst, after decades of producing a wide range copy for print, radio and TV. Thus I can speak with some authority on the way news is written and presented and identify the intention of the writer and the sub editor. We get quite a lot of your syndicated news on our cable TV and when in the UK, I was also exposed to more of your packaged news, along with the local material.

In Australia, we have several tiers of news availability. Our print media is in the hands of only a few and does not have the degree of independence and amount of variety it had in the past. In some ways it is very similar to some papers in the US and the UK, not surprising as the same men own many of them. Our Radio is basically:- commercial, again owned by few, thus a lot of commonality; the ABC, our national broadcaster, which has in depth, investigative journalism and reliable; Radio National a specialized public broadcaster catering for more depth and including greater overseas coverage. Gives much longer time to issues of importance. In TV we have: commercial, again owned by the few, but news and current affairs at greater depth than US or UK; Cable which is largely piped directly from overseas with a bit of local sport and a few programs lifted from commercial TV, a lot of the content is exactly the same as the same channels in the US. Then we have the SBS. This is a gem, it is part of our public broadcasting system, with special coverage to include the interests of our numerous ethnic groups. The news on SBS is much longer in each item and at greater depth than on other broadcasters. There are also a number of news programs from other countries that go to air on SBS. When we want to get a well balanced understanding on an issue, we turn to SBS, Radio National or either of ABC Radio or TV. In addition we have both Radio and TV produced by and for Aboriginal communities, specific to their needs and interests.

That said, I think there is a basic difference between the product that goes to air here against that in the US. Our media can question our Government, our businesses and our lifestyle without being seen as "anti" or "non". This does not seem to be the case in the US. There seems to be an official or un-official code of conduct in your media that means many questions are not asked and many subject not covered. From the perspective of one used to our media, I see your media emasculated.

Gil

Reply via email to