I wonder why the BBB has "only" 2G of space in the eMMC - aren't most "small" boot images designed to fit in 4G? It's *great* to have onboard bootable space, just seems like it would be bigger or why bother since many/most will just end up not using it and booting from flash.
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 2:48:14 PM UTC-5, Rusty Wright wrote: > > > If I plan to only boot to the SD card, why would I want/need to flash the > eMMC with the latest? > > This may be answered by the previous question's answer; does flashing the > eMMC update the > lowest level, stage 1, or whatever it's called (whatever's not in the DOS > partition) u-boot code? > I guess I'm assuming that the lowest level boot code is u-boot, but > perhaps that's incorrect. > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
