http://www.elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack#Terms_of_Use

Gerald


On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:23 AM, anupsingh chandel <
anupsinghchan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Jason,
>
> Thank you for all the documents and such an amazing product. I want to use
> BBB in my design as an LCD driver and USB host. Can I use it..? But i don't
> need other componets on the PCB apart from my requirement. Can I develop
> PCB using the gerber provided? will there be any intellactual property
> rights violation?
>
> Please let me know.
>
> Thank & regards,
> Anup.
>
>
> On Saturday, July 26, 2008 5:32:53 PM UTC+5:30, Jason Kridner wrote:
>
>> Andrew and all,
>>
>> The one thing I was hoping to have in place before sharing schematic and
>> PCB layout files was to have a really good engagement plan.  By engagement
>> plan, I essentially mean the definition of the Beagle Board project goals
>> and what type of business arrangements we'd entertain, such as endorsing
>> the sale of cases, including certain features, or turning over
>> manufacturing.  Instead of waiting for these things to be perfectly clear,
>> however, I'd like to just get the thoughts out there for some dialog.
>>
>> All Beagle Board peripherals and side products are welcome, as
>> are "competing" projects that make use of the design.  The goal of
>> Beagle is to illustrate the capability of the OMAP3530 device at a cost
>> point where most interested people can experience it.  Beagle is meant
>> to get those who are interested in OMAP to work in the open, enabling
>> us all to get along a bit faster or further in our designs.  Beagle is not
>> meant to be a substitute for the system-on-module offerings that are
>> tremendously beneficial to getting a product to market quickly, without a
>> lot of up-front costs, but instead more for software developers, students,
>> and hobbyists who don't plan on making more than one of their hardware
>> setup.
>>
>> If someone wants to put a case around Beagle and call it a
>> product, great.  To be successful selling that product, they would need to
>> add some value, such as a particular set of bundled software,
>> additional peripherals, or some cost reduction.  We don't want to be in
>> the business of controlling this market.  There are some really
>> great manufacturers out there that understand the needs of
>> community developers, system developers, and end consumers.  We'd like to
>> avoid disrupting their business plans by setting any
>> misleading expectations.  Now that Beagle is being broadly announced, it
>> seems best to keep any product or manufacturing discussion out in the
>> open.  It is understood that this isn't something many people are
>> comfortable with--to a great extent because it requires talking about
>> things that you might not ever deliver, thus hurting your brand and
>> reputation.  While this is a dangerous reality, getting real community
>> feedback on your plans is also good--and we really don't want to *OWN*
>> Beagle.  Our only concerns are that no one does it harm and that can be
>> assured by making sure that plans for Beagle are discussed openly.  Harm
>> to Beagle is defined as something that would prevent those interested from
>> being able to get/afford one, but making a better product than Beagle is in
>> no way considered harmful.  Beagle is intentionally incomplete, yet still
>> flexible enough to enable exploration.
>>
>> Editing the website is welcome.  This is a tough one for many people to
>> swallow, but at least I am confident that this is a
>> self-policing activity.  I would have been quite happy if Bridge Worldwide
>> would have added features to the website and then advertised the fact
>> that they did so (they are a nice group of talented people).  Perhaps
>> that is a bit easier to appreciate than the idea that I'm fine with
>> people editing the website to add essentially advertisements for their
>> OMAP3-based designs, services, and products.  I see that as a benefit to
>> the community.  I also think that this particular community is sufficiently
>> active to recognize insincere behavior that would result in more bad press
>> than good.  Do what you can and take credit for it, but nothing more.
>> There's nothing wrong with that.   (Web content edits are desired to be git
>> patches sent to this mailing list, similar to the Linux kernel patches.)
>>
>> Further, it is fully expected that for someone designing their own system
>> they would purchase the OMAP35x EVM (http://www.ti.com/omap35x) and
>> utilize the hardware expansion options and documented support channels.
>> Developing a board is a complex task that will cost you thousands of $US.
>> The EVM is still quite reasonably priced for developers interested in
>> building their own hardware.
>>
>> BeagleBoard.org would obviously not handle returns and repairs for boards
>> not manufactured under Gerald's supervision (or delegated supervision).
>>
>> All this said, here you go....
>>
>> These design materials are *NOT SUPPORTED*  and DO NOT  constitute a
>> reference design. Only "community" support is allowed via resources at
>> BeagleBoard.org/discuss.
>>
>> THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE DESIGN MATERIALS, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED
>> BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE
>> COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS"
>> WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING,
>> BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
>> FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY
>> AND PERFORMANCE OF THE DESIGN MATERIALS IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE
>> PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY
>> SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
>>
>> We mean it, these materials may be totally unsuitable for any purposes.
>>
>> http://beagleboard.org/hardware/design
>>
>> Please let us know what luck you have in shopping for PCB makers
>> and assemblers utilizing these materials.
>>
>> Thanks and best of luck,
>> Jason
>>  On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Gerald Coley wrote:
>>
>>  When available, it will be provided "as is" in the following formats:
>>
>>
>> Schematic...... PDF and OrCAD
>> PCB...............Gerbers and Allegro.
>>
>>
>> Gerald
>>
>>
>> On 7/24/08, opensource Aung <aung.op...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> is it available to get orcad format ?
>>>
>>> 2008/7/24, Dirk Behme <dirk....@googlemail.com>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> aung.op...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> > I would like to know the publish date of  beagleboard schematic and
>>>> > pcb layout in electronic form too.
>>>>
>>>> Do you know
>>>>
>>>> http://elinux.org/BeagleBoard#Schematic
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Dirk
>>>>
>>>> > On 7月24日, 上午4時14分, Andrew <andrew.czo...@czworks.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>Hi Jason,
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Thanks for the info.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>We love the concept of the beagleboard and hope to use it as the basis
>>>> >>for a custom design. However the 0.4mm pitch OMAP35x with PoP is state
>>>> >>of art in terms of PCB design, manufacture and assembly.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>We are looking to find a PCB maker and PCB assembler that can
>>>> >>manufacture a custom design prefereably from the UK.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>When are you likely to publish the beagleboard schematic and pcb
>>>> >>layout in electronic form?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Regards,
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Andrew.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>  --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to