On Nov 29, 2014 6:21 PM, "Nick Apperley" <napper...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Robert - What is the performance like with a Dual Core Cortex A9 compared to a Quad Core Cortex A9?
With the quad wand, you also get 2gb of ram over the dual which only has 1gb.. That alone is worth the price delta. For the price/performance it's really hard to beat the wand quad. > > > On Sunday, 30 November 2014 04:51:10 UTC+13, RobertCNelson wrote: >> >> omap5_uevm: (i was also building cloud9 during week, let's say 95% of >> the time was openjdk) >> Build needed 38:19:47, 6215244k disc space >> >> wand quad: (i was out of state while this was running, so 100% core usage..) >> Build needed 50:06:26, 6215460k disc space >> >> The dual a15's come out to 30% faster then the quad a9's... >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Robert Nelson >> http://www.rcn-ee.com/ > > -- > For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
