Hi Job Brian!

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Brian Anderson <b...@nwlink.com> wrote:
> I wanted to document some steps that I took to get Connman working for
> setting up a WiFI AP.  Connman terminology for this is "tethering".  All of
> this was done on a recent (Feb2016) Debian Jessie distro with the 4.1.x TI
> kernel.
>
> 1.  There is an issue with the systemd connman.service unit file.  Connman
> needs to be able to dynamically load kernel modules in order for tethering
> to work.  The systemd unit file lacks the CAP_SYS_MODULE capability in the
> CapabilityBoundingSet property.  The proper setting should be:
>
> CapabilityBoundingSet=CAP_KILL CAP_NET_ADMIN CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE
> CAP_NET_RAW CAP_SYS_TIME CAP_SYS_MODULE
>
> I first attempted to add a systemd drop-in to merge this into the distros
> connman.service, but alas, also ran into systemd issue 1221
> (https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1221).  Apparently this systemd
> issue was fixed after release 226.  Currently, RCN Debian images run systemd
> 215.  So, you will have to directly modify
> /lib/systemd/system/connman.service to correct this capability deficiency.
>
> I have posted a bug report to the Connman mail list, and a patch has been
> committed to Connman mainline to fix this missing capability (commit
> 9e96310).

I'll add that commit to our connman patchset..

>
> 2.  Stop and disable dnsmasq service.  dnsmasq is being used for DHCP on the
> usb gadget.  dnsmasq apparently conflicts with Connman's internal DHCP.
>
> 3.  I renamed /etc/dnsmasq.d/usb0-dhcp to /etc/dnsmasq.d/usb0-dhcp~ to
> disable boot time setup being performed by
> /opt/scripts/boot/autoconfigure_usb0.sh
>
> 4.  I renamed /etc/network/interfaces to /etc/network/interfaces.org to
> avoid any conflicts and confusion between Connman and legacy ifup/ifdown and
> test that Connman can truely deal with all network setup without having to
> resort to any legacy tools.
>
> After these fixes, I can now successfully setup a WiFI AP using
> `connmanctl`.  Traffic on the AP will have internet traffic routed to the
> ethernet interface.  Client STAs connected to the AP will have DHCP
> allocated IP addresses (typically on the 192.168.0.1/24 network).
>
> connmanctl enable wifi
> connmanctl tether wifi on <my-ssid> <my-ssid-passphrase>
>
> Note that I can also setup a usb gadget tether using similar `connmanctl`
> commands:
>
> connmanctl enable gadget
> connmanctl tether gadget on
>
> A client connected to the usb gadget will also have a DHCP allocated IP
> address (again typically on the 192.168.0.1/24 network).  You may need to
> re-plug the USB cable in order to have an IP address allocated after you
> turn on the tether.
>
> So, all of this avoids the `create_ap` hackery and the necessity to run
> dnsmasq for the usb ethernet gadget.  Unfortunately, I see no way to use
> this method to allocate a static IP address on the usb gadget.  Reading the
> Connman mail list, I doubt defining a static IP for the usb gadget would
> ever be supported as in general there is no way to guarantee that wouldn't
> be a conflict with the static IP...or at least that's the way I read the
> discussion.  But, the BBB _does_ show up via mDNS on the client (in this
> case, my Linux laptop).  Both the BBB web site and the "workstation" show up
> via Avahi Discovery browser.  And I can ssh to the BBB via <hostname>.local.
> So, maybe we don't necessarily need a static IP to supporting "connecting"
> to the BBB from usb clients?

Sweet i like it!

As long as "hostname.local" works i don't mind losing 192.168.7.2

Regards,

-- 
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to