> > So one has to wonder if it would be wise to eliminate > > /etc/network/interfaces (or at least have everthing commented out with > > warnings) to help prevent the often occurring confusion when Connman > > overrides definitions in /etc/network/interfaces. And, of course, > > /etc/network/interfaces is supposed to be "legacy". > > I think we will just blank it out, then users can add there own tweaks.. >
With a big fat warning about connman overriding certain settings! > > I think i figured out how to get the usb0 to start at 192.168.7.2 > > https://paste.debian.net/413402/ Err, couldn't figure out from the pastebin. Looked at your repo, and it appears you are trying to have some control over what the starting IP address that DHCP will hand out for tethering? If so, I don't think you can necessarily assume that the USB gadget will be the first thing needing an address can you? What if one tethers WiFi then USB? What if there is an address conflict with the localhost or USB host? I'm assuming that connman deals with these use cases when allocating a new IP address via its internal DHCP. And you still won't get the "static" address you desire. > > (so much stuff is hard-coded for 192.168.7.2) > Ya, and therein lies the problem it seems. Maybe it would be best to bite the bullet here and go for <hostname>.local discovery? OTOH, not sure if mDNS hostname discovery works on a Windoze machine? ba -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
