OK, I'm still a little busy, but I should have something example wise in a
couple hours.

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:00 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> You only need to toggle gpio ? How fast do you need it to be ? That code
> is far to complex, and uses threading, as well as callbacks for some odd
> reason. Threaded code can have performance overhead, and callbacks can
> cause problems on the stack if you're not careful.
>
> You would be better off writing your own wrapper code. You could either
> wrap the sysfs gpio files directly. Or if you wished you could wrap
> config-pin from universal io.
>
> Anyway, it's getting late here so perhaps tomorrow I'll write up a quick
> example, that is far less code than D.R. Molloy's  . . . uh . ..library ?
> The thing is, the sysfs directory / file structure is already there and
> functional. Why would anyone need to write so much code to encapsulate it ?
> *shrug*
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Raul Piper <raulpbloo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Attached.
>> One is the cpp code and other is the bash script.
>> cpp code uses the GPIO class from the attached GPIO.7z .
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, July 14, 2016 at 9:50:45 AM UTC+5:30, William Hermans wrote:
>>>
>>> Let's put it this way. No code, no help . . .
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:19 PM, William Hermans <yyr...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> #code2
>>>> //create an instance of gpio41
>>>>  //set direction as OUT
>>>> //set value as 1
>>>> usleep(100000);
>>>> //set value 0
>>>>
>>>> Output : Toggle doesnt happens
>>>>
>>>> Whats this ? This is not code. At best it's comments, and usleep().
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Raulp <imsaura...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OK let em explain a bit more :
>>>>> #code 1
>>>>> sudo echo 41 > export
>>>>> cd gpio41
>>>>> sudo chmod 666 direction
>>>>> sudo chmod 666 value
>>>>> sudo echo out > direction
>>>>> sudo echo 1 > value
>>>>> sleep 1
>>>>> sudo echo 0 > value
>>>>>
>>>>> Output : Toggle on the GPIO 41
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> #code2
>>>>> //create an instance of gpio41
>>>>>  //set direction as OUT
>>>>> //set value as 1
>>>>> usleep(100000);
>>>>> //set value 0
>>>>>
>>>>> Output : Toggle doesnt happens
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now the output I am referring to is the functioning of the hardware I
>>>>> have used.(ignore toggling , it happens anyway using the code#2)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Or does your code simply open, and use  the file descriptors without
>>>>> any error checking what so ever ?
>>>>> >> I dont use error codes to check , but I have seen in the
>>>>> oscilloscope that the signal transition is happening according to my code.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Rp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 at 8:52:30 PM UTC+5:30, William Hermans
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I try to do the same using a user space C application I dont get
>>>>>>> the expected response.I am running this app as sudo'er and I have
>>>>>>> oscilloscope'd the timings of HIGH/LOW levels of the GPIOs and compared 
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> with that of the manually writing procedure of GPIOS. The waveform and 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> timing diagrams almost matches (95%)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not exactly sure what you saying here . . . However, in code are
>>>>>> you actually checking for errors, and error codes. Or does your code 
>>>>>> simply
>>>>>> open, and use  the file descriptors without any error checking what so 
>>>>>> ever
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seeing the code would probably help a lot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Raulp <imsaura...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have interfaced a hardware using the 5 Gpios on BBB.I can talk to
>>>>>>> this device using GPIOs by manually (echoing 0 and 1 to the GPIOS) 
>>>>>>> writing
>>>>>>> to it in the sys/class/gpio directory by first exporting the Gpios and
>>>>>>> configuring their directions and value.It works perfectly fine.
>>>>>>> But,
>>>>>>> When I try to do the same using a user space C application I dont
>>>>>>> get the expected response.I am running this app as sudo'er and I have
>>>>>>> oscilloscope'd the timings of HIGH/LOW levels of the GPIOs and compared 
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> with that of the manually writing procedure of GPIOS. The waveform and 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> timing diagrams almost matches (95%)
>>>>>>> So,
>>>>>>> What could mysteriously be missing here.?I can go deep into
>>>>>>> analyzing the wave-forms and timing diagrams as well if there is an 
>>>>>>> issue
>>>>>>> in the timings of the Signals.
>>>>>>> Please advice.Thanks in advance !
>>>>>>> -Rp
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/cb65b710-203e-4579-8c08-e2b817dc7a03%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/cb65b710-203e-4579-8c08-e2b817dc7a03%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/521956ed-983d-49b9-85f2-62e269dcf7fa%40googlegroups.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/521956ed-983d-49b9-85f2-62e269dcf7fa%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/68d794b1-fdd4-49de-acd0-30923269f437%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/68d794b1-fdd4-49de-acd0-30923269f437%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORr9KChZfC2DkBuYLvseVuwUUMtx33dRhNuVaqjWQJaKqA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to