No, search the web.

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks a lot again.
> Now, can you please read my original question ?
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:38 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks again for the help.
>>> I never send questions to the forum before I did extensive research via
>>> Internet.
>>> And I did not find something like Broadway for QT. I found nothing
>>> comparable and mature enough..
>>> If I wrong - please send me a reference.
>>
>>
>> What you're asking for does not exist. So, like I said . . . you need to
>> search the web, for something that is close enough to meet your criteria,
>> and adapt it. Either that, or use a bloated framework, or write your own
>> from scratch.
>>
>> So, let me give you some advice. Don't confuse someone who is being
>> short, and to the point ( concise ) as being rude, or disrespectful. I'm
>> not even sure how one could perceive this over the internet . . . Also
>> someone who has gone through the same process you're going through now.
>> Only I researched this 2 + years ago.
>>
>> You need a web, and websocket server. *IF* you want real time
>> instrumentation. If you do not need real time instrumentation, then you
>> could look into using / writing a web API( CRUD ).
>>
>> The only "framework" I know of that fits your criteria most closely is
>> libmongoose. It is tiny, and does a lot. It also does what it does very
>> quickly. However, the code spans two files and weights in at around 20k
>> lines of code. Where most of it is very terse reading, and the
>> documentation for this library is terrible. This library is also cross
>> platform, so much of the code is redundant, but for different OSes.
>>
>> Also, most, or all of the control you're going to need can be handled by
>> the front end via html, and javascript.
>>
>> Anyway, there is a lot more out there. Which again . . . you're going to
>> have to search for, and determine for yourself if it is better for you, or
>> not.
>>
>> --
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/wufrB8capTU/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORqyHZQOQB6u5QEMqMF5twH10qSbmAGisMZ9ktdSW4v1iw%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORqyHZQOQB6u5QEMqMF5twH10qSbmAGisMZ9ktdSW4v1iw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CA%2BfsX4ARJMVwVSwZcJBEO_bGOtG8FO0K%3DChF%3Dbbe6_J8b4j%3DVg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CA%2BfsX4ARJMVwVSwZcJBEO_bGOtG8FO0K%3DChF%3Dbbe6_J8b4j%3DVg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORr3sAgcy3oN1TO65T14sujo%3DcnAa-HcfYkf7j1JLy%2BzQQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to