Il giorno mercoledì 19 ottobre 2016 10:21:53 UTC+2, Matteo Facchinetti ha scritto: > > > I'm pretty sure we will have to back-port wayland from stretch.. >> >> But this scares me: >> >> >> http://git.ti.com/gitweb/?p=graphics/omap5-sgx-ddk-um-linux.git;a=commit;h=8d4ba04a2da59989b21aacca9defdf387e321695 >> >> >> the gcc 4.9 -> gcc 5.x was so much "FUN" in stretch over the summer, ^ >> might mean we have to just use stretch.. >> >> > I agree with you.... this commit could be determinant for choose a right > strategy...this library now are built with gcc 5.x!!! > > IMHO could be a good idea to work in stretch. > From debian.org site, on 2016-Nov will starts the freeze transition. > So packets could be considered quite "stable" and I think it's better to > use a tested environment, for the wayland complexity. > > Personally I don't like the back-port operation. The risk is to obtain a > custom wayland version and discover new problems generated by backport, > without debian support. > > Should be fantastic to have a minimal stretch image with kernel 4.4 + SGX, > only console runlevel 3, without X, as base to start to try wayland. > ....... ops.... I use a wrong word...gramatical mistake.. sorry.... It would be fantastic to have a minimal stretch image....
-- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/c8376d15-755f-48ff-97d1-e0137ecd7242%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
