On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:29 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:22 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> It'll break bonejs too, but I can live with that. Just an additional two >> characters in a string somewhere in my code. A few times . . .hehe > > > Actually, it won't break my implementation at all. Just need to change how > the implementation is used. pwm(0, 0.0 ) instead of pwm(0, 0). Short term > fix, long term, maybe I should stick with pwm(0, 0) and change the > implementation parsing. *shrug*
It's a little more then that, the first 0 comes from parent: /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm-0:0 /sys/class/pwm/pwmchipA/pwm-A:B Regards, -- Robert Nelson https://rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAOCHtYjfmP7mHEmhkX98Gv%2BqUNbhU1DbDMXAX2q2kWOWXAf-iw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
