Hi,

FYI, recent remoteproc RPMSG versions have moved from mailboxes to 
interrupts for 
communication: 
https://git.ti.com/pru-software-support-package/pru-software-support-package/commit/69805828df0f262fb60363c2db189d1b8d0b693c

A race-free algorithm would require the interrupts simply to wake the peer, 
and rely on shared memory FIFO for handling events. AFAIK, that's the idea 
used by virtio/RPMSG. In pseudo-code:

1. Wait for interrupt.
2. Clear interrupt.
3. Drain the events-FIFO located in shared memory.

Regards,
Dimitar

On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 4:09:33 AM UTC+2, Ken Shirriff wrote:
>
> I'm trying to send information back and forth between the processor and 
> the PRU, and I'm looking for suggestions on the best way to do this.
>
> Currently I'm using PRU_EVTOUT0 to send events from the PRU. The processor 
> code does a select() on the PRU_EVTOUT_0 fd to find out when an event has 
> happened. Then I do a prussdrv_pru_wait_event() and 
> prussdrv_pru_clear_event() to get rid of the event. (The select is because 
> I also want to wait for network data.)
>
> However, this is kind of a mess of race conditions, since an event can 
> come in between the select and the clear. Or two events can happen before 
> the select. So I have various status flags that the PRU sets in memory. But 
> that leads to other race conditions.
>
> So, I'm wondering if there's a better way to handle events back and forth. 
> Other people must have dealt with this and come up with good solutions.
>
> I've seen stuff about Remoteproc - is that the cool new technology? Its 
> mailboxes seem like a good model. However, I'd rather stick with the UIO 
> model instead of moving to a new kernel and rewriting everything if 
> possible. 
>
> My application, in case it's relevant: I'm building a network gateway with 
> the PRU bit-banging a 3 megabit/second Ethernet. So the processor sends 
> packets to the PRU to transmit, and the PRU tells the processor about 
> incoming packets. The PRU needs to tell the processor when a send is 
> completed, or when a packet has arrived. 
>
> Thanks for any help,
> Ken
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/1d770722-5d3e-4be2-89e3-5e0385cc03d9%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to