On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:41 AM Niresh <nireshshara...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> You are right, I've done a little experiment to confirm the same.
>
> Test #1: Made both system and RTC time synchronized with  2020-09-02 09:00:30 
> and then rebooted , both time syncs.
>
> Test #2: Made RTC time delay with an hour by using command hwclock --set 
> --date "09/02/20 08:00:30 "and system time 2020-09-02 09:00:30 and then 
> rebooted. Now, the system time is not sync with RTC,it remains unchanged 
> 2020-09-02 09:00:30
>
> Test #3:   Made RTC time advance with an hour by using command hwclock --set 
> --date "09/02/20 10:00:30 "and system time 2020-09-02 09:00:30 and then 
> rebooted.   Now, the system time is sync with RTC, that's with 2020-09-02 
> 10:00:30
>
> Could you please tell me starts from which version of kernel 
> "BB-I2C2-RTC-DS3231.dtbo" device tree works. I will tell you why,  I was 
> using arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-4.9 to compile my application code in the 
> 4.4.30-ti-r64 kernel, and it compiled and ran perfectly. Now the same 
> application code gives me an error message with compiler 
> arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-8 in the new image 4.19.94-ti-r42.
>
> Like I said before, I am not a linux guy and the developer, who coded this 
> and has left the organisation, cautioned me to stick with 4.4.30-ti-r64 
> kernel for stable operation of application code.  Please advise which version 
> is good to go and how to overcome this issue.

Can you share the actual "error message"?

Regards,

-- 
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAOCHtYgMqVpXgg6qJ1fgtkCbJCY2f8OtcDfVEYbYW3CWbFA0rw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to