Super cool. I should try to update my world a little and see how much I can
take advantage of v3 ( out of personal interest ). Thanks for the anecdata
Ben.
Alan

On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 19:06, Ben Blount <b...@bben.us> wrote:

> Fava, importers, and beancount-import all work fine with v3 and I
> personally use all 3 with v3. I do recall some very minor patching being
> required at one point, primarily to update import names. As you've said by
> far the biggest change is in the importer structure.
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:33 AM Alan H <a...@polyphase.ca> wrote:
>
>> My understanding is (I'm on v2) is that v3 is syntax-compatible with v2
>> so the penalty (if there is one) for starting with V2 would be small. The
>> areas where there are clear gaps (to my mind) are:
>>
>>    -  web frontend - AFAICT Fava is Beancount v2 only.
>>    - importers have changed substantially
>>    - some third party systems might not yet support v3 (beancount-import
>>    comes to mind - upon which I rely heavily).
>>
>> Pivoting this to the positive; I'd love to hear from folks using v3 and
>> what they use for 'favs-like' reporting / browsing and how they manage
>> imports.
>> I might be missing a trick here where you can switch between v2 and v3
>> seamlessly (for example) and still do reporting using a v2 env and select
>> what you want from v3.?
>>
>> Anyone using V3 (and V2?) feel like commenting?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 11:33:38 AM UTC Colin Ingarfield wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> About a year ago I evaluated beancount to organize my finances.  As
>>> recommended at the time I used v2.  Made some good progress but my project
>>> fell to the wayside.
>>>
>>> Now I'm giving it another shot, and wondering if I should use v2 or v3?
>>> Getting all my financial info together is a fair bit of work, and I'd
>>> rather not change it all if v3 becomes "official" later this year.
>>>
>>> FWIW I'm a software developer, so if v3 requires use of git, C++
>>> compilers, etc., that's not an issue.  But if it's unstable then I'd rather
>>> move ahead with v2.
>>>
>>> Thanks for such a great tool.
>>>
>>> -- Colin
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Beancount" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/355eb4cb-0189-4679-af63-d10725289578n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/355eb4cb-0189-4679-af63-d10725289578n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Beancount" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beancount/h3YHCz44lIU/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CACGEkZszOAU7fk28wSPKyg0C8Ow04Xdak43kQWur8fFRvqWJXA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CACGEkZszOAU7fk28wSPKyg0C8Ow04Xdak43kQWur8fFRvqWJXA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
a l a n a t p o l y p h a s e d o t c a

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Beancount" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAB5fSsqM0YscOUESqjeJmAreeWhUDYL15T9-kt2xvQ%2BBO6FPnQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to