At 01:25 PM 08/08/2001 +0100, Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
>I am beginning to wish I had not posted the question about parsing the
>info tacked on to the url, because of all the contention it seems to
>have caused. I apologise.
Why do you think that all the "contention" in this thread was because of
something you said? I looked at your previous postings and am at a loss as
to why you would think this.
The "criticisms" levied in this thread were not directed at you at all, but
rather towards a general /type/ of person.
>I am working my way through the rat book
>and am implementing the news example but without using embperl (as an
>exercise). My error was simple ( I had assumed that to use the param
>call one needed to have generated a form. The answers from the list
>put me straight in about ten minutes - a truly wonderfull service - I
>might have spent several hours unlearning what I thought I knew
>without the help of the list. I do not work in IT and am trying to do
>this /between patients/ as it were.
Heh...i don't work in IT either--my businesss card says im a video editor,
animator and "multimedia" dweeb--but I actually like coding Perl better
than my other "patients" to tell you the truth :)
Aloha,
mel
--
mel matsuoka Hawaiian Image Productions
Chief Executive Alphageek (vox)1.808.531.5474
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (fax)1.808.526.4040
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
