On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, John Edwards wrote:
> It's messy and relies on you naming you subroutines to match the static data
> stored in %funcs. It will introduce more possible points of failure in the
> code, make it harder to debug and maintain. Unless you've got a really good
> reason why you need to do this, I'd suggest you don't.
Why do you say that? I can think of a lot of reasons to create a hash of
function references.
-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/btfwk/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest.
-- Benjamin Franklin
