Why can't you use 'signatures' feature at the first place?
Usually, it means that you tight yourself to system perl, which is not a
good decision at all.
Don't trust me on this, trust brian d foy
https://www.effectiveperlprogramming.com/2015/11/apple-recommends-installing-your-own-perl/
Install different perl version is quite a trivial task, especially with
tools like perlbrew and plenv.
Next, You can easily install modules you need via cpanm or carton.
10.12.2017 18:18, hw пишет:
hw <h...@adminart.net> writes:
Gil Magno <gilma...@gilmagno.com> writes:
On 19/11/17 13:57, hw wrote:
without being able to use feature 'signatures', how do I verify
that parameters passed to a function have been passed to it by
the caller?
https://metacpan.org/pod/signatures
https://metacpan.org/pod/signatures#SEE-ALSO
https://metacpan.org/pod/Sub::Signatures
You can search for 'signatures' on CPAN in order to find other modules
alike.
Ah, yes I should have thought of that, thanks! There´s even a package
'perl-Parse-Method-Signatures.noarch' in Centos; I´ll look into that.
Well, so I looked and found it isn´t for what I´d need it for.
Is there really no good alternative to signatures?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
