On Saturday, May 11, 2002, at 01:12 , drieux wrote:
> > thought I would formalize the play a bit, and see > what folks think about: > > http://www.wetware.com/drieux/CS/lang/Perl/Beginners/RegEx/HowPatternsEvolve. > txt http://www.wetware.com/drieux/pbl/RegEx/HowPatternsEvolve.txt sorry about that folks. this friendly mailer forces line wraps - so a simpler work around at this point was to put the symbolic link in on the webServer - update the <base href....> and move on.... So now that I am older and wiser - what is the orthodox and canonical partitioning of classical perl problems? ciao drieux --- Given a choice between a 10th level indentation problem with regards to variable scoping and regular expresseions XOR formalizing, as provable, the two functions f(x) - resolve for all persons x whether they are members of the set "Real Anti-Communists[tm]" or "Kook Anti-Communists" or Red Hordes g(p) - that resolves for all propositions whether this is an element of either of the above or merely Red Communist Propoganda what was that problem with a RegEx you wanted fixed????? That at least can be shown to be solvable.... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
