Jason, et al --

...and then drieux said...
% 
% On Monday, June 3, 2002, at 07:53 , Jason Frisvold wrote:
% 
% >     Am I in the dark here?  I thought the latest stable was 5.6.1?
% >What's with 5.7.x??  I know 5.8.x is brandy new...  And 6.x is
% >apparently going to be the "new" god to follow...

The short answer to your question is that the perl folks have adopted the
linux kernel method of version numbering, where you have 

  major.minor.patch

to describe a particular "snapshot".  The major version is pretty
obvious, and the patch bit is pretty obvious, too.  The trick is the
middle bit: when minor is even, it's a stable release for the world; when
minor is odd, it's a development release that isn't necessarily unstable
but is definitely where the playing is going on.

If you want to stay "up to speed", all you have to have are N.<even>.highest
and you're there, and you don't have to worry about an interface changing 
or something breaking from one day to the next as you would with good old
(well, new :-) N.<odd>.whatever.


HTH & HAND

:-D
-- 
David T-G                      * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/    Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!

Attachment: msg25309/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to