On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 05:01  PM, Michael Fowler wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:50:53PM -0500, James Edward Gray II wrote:
>> It's the indirect method call syntax, as far as I understand.
>
> It looks like it, but it isn't.  See
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg33969.html for a 
> recent
> discussion on that.

Thanks for the correction.  Sorry, about the misinformation.

James


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to