---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Anders F Björklund <[email protected]> Date: Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 6:00 PM Subject: Re: Building Smart for Open Indiana aka OpenSolaris To: kunal ghosh <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]
kunal ghosh wrote: > hi all, > i just smart to build on OI . I used > smart 1.3.1 http://launchpad.net/smart/trunk/1.3.1/+download/smart-1.3.1.tar.bz2 > smart solaris patch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~afb/smart/solaris/revision/858 > > and then > python setup.py build > sudo python setup.py install > > everything worked fine out of the box. > > did i miss out anything ? Don't think so, that should be the "stable" option (although mostly untested) There's also the smart 1.4 branch and the pkg support, if wanting "unstable": https://code.launchpad.net/~smartpm/smart/trunk https://code.launchpad.net/~afb/smart/pkg I have no idea whether you actually _want_ the SVR4 .pkg support or not, but it and the .7z was added for compatibility with BeleniX earlier on... (Normally one would use .gz and .lzma rather than .zip and .7z, but anyway) It mostly consists of a pkg backend, and pkg_dir/pkg_site/pkg_sys channels. If I am reading http://www.belenix.org/ correctly, you are trying to use Smart with RPM5 (5.2.1) which should be easier than adding a PKG backend ? Then again with all the tarball package formats, what's another binary one. There was also the Nexenta (GNU/Solaris) Core, that used deb/dpkg instead... --anders -- regards ------- Kunal Ghosh Dept of Computer Sc. & Engineering. Sir MVIT Bangalore,India permalink: member.acm.org/~kunal.t2 Blog:kunalghosh.wordpress.com Website:www.kunalghosh.net46.net
_______________________________________________ belenix-discuss mailing list http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/belenix-discuss http://groups.google.com/group/belenix-discuss
