Sriram Narayanan <[email protected]> wrote: > Some months ago, I'd conducted a session at the BOSUG meet at > Thoughtworks on how we could aim for continuous integration and build > pipelines for ON. It does seem feasible, and if this is in place, > we'll be able to replace components as and when we want (e.g. replace > some existing userland components with those form ATT's AST or from > the Hierloom project - something that had come up on illumos-discuss).
Heirloom seems to be a dead project mostly based on OpenSolaris code. There have only been very few changes during the past years and not even real and important fixes added by Sun since 2005 have been applied. So be very careful with that source. There is more activity in the "Schily" project, e.g. with the Bourne Shell. I recently fixed all known bugs in the Bourne Shell that have been documented since 1988. Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ belenix-discuss mailing list http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/belenix-discuss http://groups.google.com/group/belenix-discuss
