On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> wrote: > Lionel Cons <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I am not interested in these people, as I live in the present and as I >> > don't >> > like false claims. >> > >> > Given the fact that I added the command line history editor I wrote >> > 1982..1984 >> > for my "bsh" to the Bourne Shell in December 2006, it would not even be >> > promotional if I did add a related hint to the wiki article as we now have >> > 2012. >> >> *sigh* >> You are diverting to other topics. See below. > > It seems that you did not follow the discussion. I was just replying to a > false > claim from Irek Szczesniak.
Joerg, this was not a false claim. The POSIX and SUS test suites are very important and there is little to do if you do not pass it. My mistake, by accidental omission, was to say that the written standard and the standard interpretations done by Open Group and other standard bodies have more importance (and precedence, before anything else). Furthermore I have to say that I find your behavior very offensive and aggressive (mainly your self promotion of SchillyX tools, which no one is really using in real life). I think you have been told about that by other standards boffins like Don Cragun (I think you will remember him from incidents like http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-August/001348.html) or Andrew Josey (director of standards within the Open Group) that you have to work on your attitude in email communication. Not that this will change your behavior, but I still keep trying. Irek _______________________________________________ belenix-discuss mailing list http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/belenix-discuss http://groups.google.com/group/belenix-discuss
