On 20 August 2012 13:17, Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> wrote: > Lionel Cons <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Problems: >> - SchilliX uses Bourne shell as /usr/bin/sh, not ksh93. This pretty >> much kills the option > > Could you please stop spreading lies?
*deep breath* OK, I am trying hard not to be offended. Joerg, please explain what you mean with "lies". I'm trying to apply a management view here: What are the advantages and what are the disadvantages, what are the single point of failures, how much time must be invested? As far as I can see ksh93 is the option which consumes less time, has less disadvantages, no single point of failures (relating to the problem that you are (AFAIK) the only maintainer for the Solaris Bourne shell) and is established in Solaris 11. What's wrong with this picture in a *realistic* world? Lionel _______________________________________________ belenix-discuss mailing list http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/belenix-discuss http://groups.google.com/group/belenix-discuss
