I did not see my reply in the mailing list, so I asume that something went 
wrong and I need to resend my reply.

Moinak Ghosh <[email protected]> wrote:

> >>    3. I remember a team member fixing a customer escalated bug when he
> >>        figured out that a particular supposedly binary search for looking 
> >> up
> >>        pathnames was actually doing a linear search - some messy code.
> >
> >>        This only points to the age of the codebase, 25yrs approx. Old and
> >>        somewhat clunky with a whole bunch of commands and libs.
> >
> > Isn't this something that should be be fixed with pkgserv?
> >
> > I am able to install the whole ON base within less than 2 minutes over the
> > network, even though the packages are compressed via xz -9. It would be of
> > interest to know what time you get.....
> >
> > Could you please fetch:
> >
> >         
> > http://download.berlios.de/pub/schillix-on/packages/pkgs-schillix-on.txt
> >
> > and follow the instructions. Note that this works directly with pkgadd over 
> > the
> > network.
>
>    Will check ...

I would be interested to see how long it takes for you.

> > The packages system was created in 1982, so it is 30 years old. But not the
> > time of creation matters...
>
>    Age will not matter if the code is properly maintained. How old is
> the Solaris
>    kernel ?  SVR4 code has been badly maintained due various factors including
>    bad management that I do not like to discuss here.

Sun in general was bad with maintaining existing software. They left a lot of 
software unmaintained during the past 20 years.

However replacing existing software by new one is usually a suboptimal decision.
IPS fixed some problems from the SVr4 package system, but introduced a lot of 
new bugs that never have been present with pkgadd.


> >>    I actually respect SVR4 as a concept but am not interested in doing 
> >> anything
> >>    with its current codebase.
> >
> > Well, if we look at what existing OpenSolaris based distros use, there only
> > seems to be IPS and from what I've seen with IPS during the past 2 years, I
> > don't like to use it.
>
>    The worst case happens when I try to install a new package in my 
> OpenIndiana
>    installation after a gap of say one month. Several minutes just to get a 
> pkg
>    of a few hundred KBs in size over my 8MBps link. Most of the time is spent
>    in plan creation I think.

So the expected download time for the set of SchilliX-ON base pacakges should 
be around 2 minutes.

I guess that a complete install will take 3 minutes.

> >
> > On the other side, why take something completely new if there is experiences
> > with a mature existing system?
> >
>
>    My point is the mature system is missing very key pieces like package
>    management. Working on adding it will amount to re-doing a solved problem.

pkgadd manages packages, so what do you understand by package management?

>    My preference is to use a ready-made tested solution. In addition I simply
>    do not like the SVR4 code. You can call it personal bias, but that is how 
> it
>    is.  I want SVR4 support but in a different way.

On the other side, IPS is not ready for even be discussed with me, as I like to 
use an established systen, it seems that the svr4 package system is the best 
base.

>    I want to focus my efforts to better explore Pacman and see how to add
>    Solaris platform and SVR4 support there. There are multiple options 
> including
>    an alien kind of converter:  http://joeyh.name/code/alien/
>    So one can auto-convert from SVR4 format to Pacman format.

I cannot see that this support svr4 packages, but I am shure it will not 
support IPS. So did you think about the fact that Illumos only supports IPS?

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [email protected]                (uni)  
       [email protected] (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
belenix-discuss mailing list
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/belenix-discuss
http://groups.google.com/group/belenix-discuss

Reply via email to