On 9/25/06, Golam Mortuza Hossain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/25/06, Deepayan Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 500 is too little. Isn't there some constraint imposed by the tagger > > (or was that the old non-free one)? > > > > Yep!! TreeTagger had constraint on maximum amount of data to be > processed at a time but that too was quite high. I think it was > almost megabytes of text data (xml-ed, so actual text is less than that)! > > So whats your suggestion? Should it be roughly equal to few paragraphs?
Well, larger is always better. What's the constraint? Is it the load on SF's servers? Any limit that returns the results within 10 seconds under "average" conditions should be a good target. Deepayan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bengalinux-core mailing list Bengalinux-core@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bengalinux-core
