IESG state changed to AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from AD Evaluation
AD review
=====
Thanks for this document. I was hard-pushed to find anything to talk
about, so I guess you did a good job or I am losing my touch.
The points below are pretty minor, but they will get pulled up in
IETF last call reviews, so I think we should fix them in a new
revision before i start last call.
I'll put the document into "Revised I-D needed" state, and start the
last call as soon as I see a new revision.
Thanks for the work,
Adrian
---
In section 3
When a BGP speaker receives a ROUTE-REFRESH message that contains a
CP-ORF, and that ROUTE-REFRESH message violates any of the encoding
rules specified in Section 2, the BGP speaker MUST log the event and
ignore the entire ROUTE-REFRESH message.
I think you need to allow for event logging to implement thresholds to
avoid the logs becoming a gating factor when there is something evil
going on. Probably that makes
s/MUST/SHOULD/
And add "although an implementation MAY apply logging thresholds to
avoid excessive messaging or log file overflow."
---
Section 7 needs to include a request to the IANA to update the
references to the code points to point to this document when
published as an RFC.
---
Section 8 has
o When negotiating the ORF capability, advertise willingness to
receive the CP-ORF only to known, trusted iBGP peers
which implies that there is a mechanism to
- negotiate the ORF capability
- advertise willingness to receive CP-ORF
Do you need a small section on this? Probably just a reference to the
negotiation process for the ORF capability, and a note saying how the
CP-ORF willingness is indicated.
---
I completely understand where you are coming from with section 8, but I
also know how our friends in the Security Area will respond.
Can you add a very short section noting...
Security considerations for BGP are presented in [RFC4271] while
further security analysis of BGP is found in [RFC6952].
(you'll have to add an informative reference to 6952)
ID Tracker URL:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-orf-covering-prefixes/
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
