Hello Martin, WG, It came to our notice recently that there was an old IPR filing on an earlier related draft that had not been submitted to the IETF. An IPR statement has now been submitted and is in progress. This was an inadvertent oversight, and we apologize for the late disclosure.
Regards, -Dhananjaya On 2/22/16, 8:58 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" <bess-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of martin.vigour...@nokia.com> wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02 [1] as a working group Document. > >Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, >please also state the reasons). > >This poll runs until *the 7th of March*. > >Note that IPR has been disclosed against an earlier version of this >document: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2284/ > >Yet, we are *coincidentally* also polling for knowledge of any other >IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed >in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 >and 5378 for more details). > >==> *If* you are listed as a document author or contributor please >respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any >relevant IPR. > >The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from >each author and contributor. > >If you are not listed as an author or contributor, then please >explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet >been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > >Thank you, > >Martin & Thomas >bess chairs > >[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fm-bess-service-chaining/ > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
