Please see 1 comment inline [Bruno]


From: Eric C Rosen [mailto:ero...@juniper.net]

On 4/4/2016 5:28 PM, 
bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com> wrote:

> My issue is how do we prove that_nobody_  is using it? Proving the negative 
> is hard, and silence is not part of the proof. To prove the negative, we 
> would need explicit statement from everyone, which looks impossible.



I think you're exaggerating a little ;-)  I'm having trouble believing

that you are unable to determine whether the 3107 "multiple labels"

feature is in use in any of your company's deployments.



[Bruno] Indeed, we had a different perspective.

On my side, I was assuming that the IETF would not introduce a non-backward 
compatible specification change, without first checking that none of the 
deployment would be affected. My point was that this is hard to prove.

On your side, you were assuming that the responsibility would be on each 
network operator to check whether they would have an issue. This is breaking 
the big problem into N smaller ones.





--Bruno

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to