Hi, Ali and I decided to keep the normative reference to RFC 5512 rather than changing it to Eric's tunnel encapsulation draft because the normative reference pre-dates Eric's draft and because our draft does not use any of the new capabilities introduced in Eric's draft.
Ali and I would also like to request that Jorge be the document shepherd for this draft. Yours Irrespectively, John From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:saja...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 3:05 AM To: John E Drake; EXT - thomas.mo...@orange.com; IDR; BESS; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-over...@tools.ietf.org; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US); draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-en...@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay vs. draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps Folks, I have updated and published rev03 of even-overlay draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay/ The main changes are: 1. section 10.2 - DCI using ASBR 2. The setting of Ethernet tag and VNI fields - there were some inconsistencies in different sections. Section 5.1.3 captures the setting of these fields for different type of services in pretty good details. All other sections were cleaned up and now refer to section 5.1.3. Thomas, The draft is ready for its long-overdue WG LC considering how long its has been around and its multi-vendor implementation status. Regards, Ali
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
