Adrian, the question is mainly what we are trying to achieve here with the 
draft.
If the goal is providing E2E SR-TE and utilizing all paths between the 
different DC(s) e.g. SR-TE policy does this as well.

You advertise a BGP SR-TE-policy with the different paths and you bind the 
prefix to them using the BGP-NH/colour. You can define a colour and weights and 
preferences to determine if you want to use ECMP, different weights or active 
standby, etc. A similar use case is described here: 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy-01

I am mainly arguing the way we convey the different SR-TE path information. 
With SR-TE policy you get a level of indirection which means every time the 
path changes you don’t need to re-advertise the prefix, but just update the 
SR-TE policy update.

What is not part of SR-TE policy is GW discovery and you would need a 
controller to achieve the same thing. 

Hope this clarifies


On 20/07/2017, 16:29, "Adrian Farrel" <adr...@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

    Hi Wim,
    
    That wasn't my most glorious moment :-)
    
    I don't think that draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gateway and
    draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy are anything other than 
complementary.
    Nor, apparently does Eric as he is a co-author of both documents :-)
    
    I think high-level document names can sometimes lead to some confusion, but 
the
    combination of "BGP", "SR", and "TE" in the same overviews only goes to show
    that they are in the same general space, not that they overlap.
    
    If you take a look at draft-farrel-spring-sr-domain-interconnect-00 you'll 
see
    it references [I-D.previdi-idr-segment-routing-te-policy] (now adopted by 
the
    IDR working group) as the assumed mechanism for advertising intra-AS links 
that
    are SR TE policies. We also note that
    [I-D.previdi-idr-segment-routing-te-policy] offers a method for label stack
    compression.
    
    I think the two mechanisms provide different functions, but functions that 
could
    (or even should) be integrated into a deployable solution.
    
    Thanks (and sorry again),
    
    Adrian
    
    

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to