Dear Glenn, I am very glad to know that all issues are addressed. Thank you very much for your elaborate review and advice. I really appreciate it.
Best regards, -- tsuno 2018-07-30 21:29 GMT+09:00 Glenn Mansfield Keeni <gl...@cysols.com>: > Dear Tsuno, > This draft is looking good. Thank you for the > good work. I have no further issues with the document > and the MIB. I believe the MIB review is complete. > > Thanks again for your cooperation during this rather > long and tedious review. > > Glenn > > > On 2018/07/30 19:39, Hiroshi Tsunoda wrote: >> >> Hi Glenn, >> >> I have submitted draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-08. >> Links to the draft and diff are as follows. >> >> URL: >> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-08.txt >> Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-08 >> Htmlized: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib >> Diff: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-08 >> >> Please see some notes below. >> >>> 1. Delete the last paragraph of IANA considerations. >> >> >> Done. >> >>> 2. Move >>> mvpnBgpCmcastRouteWithdrawalTimer, >>> mvpnBgpSrcSharedTreeJoinTimer, >>> from mvpnBgpGroup to mvpnScalarGroup >>> unless there is a good reason to keep those in mvpnBgpGroup >> >> >> I have added new OBJECT-GROUP called mvpnBgpScalarGroup. >> All BGP-specific scalar objects (see the list below) are in the group now. >> This is for providing more appropriate compliance statements. >> >> - mvpnMldpMvrfs, >> - mvpnBgpV4Mvrfs, >> - mvpnBgpV6Mvrfs, >> - mvpnBgpCmcastRouteWithdrawalTimer, >> - mvpnBgpSrcSharedTreeJoinTimer >> >> I hope this version clears all of your requirements. >> >> Best, >> >> -- tsuno >> > _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
