Hi everyone,
1) I think the choice node named "ac-or-pw" gives up the probability to support
vES and I-ESI
+--rw ethernet-segments
+--rw ethernet-segment* [name]
+--rw (ac-or-pw)?
| +--:(ac)
| | +--rw ac* if:interface-ref
| +--:(pw)
| +--rw pw* pw:pseudowire-ref
So I think it will be better to rename the node to "es-forms" or something
else .
I think the "pw" case is a form of vES yet. but there are other forms of vES.
I think it will be a bit weird to take one form of vES into consideration and
ignore the other forms.
Even if the other forms of vES would not be added in the near future, I think
it will be better to name it with a neutral phrase that will not conflict with
future extensions.
2) The PBB Source B-MAC for zero-ESI is forced to be configured per-EVI-basis
according to its current version,
but RFC7623 says that "The PE may use a shared B-MAC address for all its
single-homed segments and/or all its multi-homed Single-Active segments
(e.g.,segments operating in per-I-SID load-balancing mode)".
So I think a PBB source B-MAC per PE should be added. because it is typically
not necessary to assign a unique B-MAC to each EVI.
Best Regards,
Bob_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
