Thanks for bringing attention to this. Will fix.. Thanks, Himanshu
From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanand...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 3:56 PM To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] [bess] L2VPN YANG model Hi, -10 version of draft-ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang contains two YANG models: - ietf-pseudowi...@2018-10-17.yang<mailto:ietf-pseudowi...@2018-10-17.yang> - ietf-l2...@2019-05-28.yang<mailto:ietf-l2...@2019-05-28.yang> -09 version of the same draft contains the same two YANG models, but with these dates: - ietf-pseudowi...@2018-10-22.yang<mailto:ietf-pseudowi...@2018-10-22.yang> - ietf-l2...@2018-02-06.yang<mailto:ietf-l2...@2018-02-06.yang> In essence, the newer draft has an older version of ietf-pseudowires module, while the older draft has a newer version. Is this intentional? The effect of this is that even if there are changes made to ietf-pseudowires module in the -10 draft, because of its date, and in a repository with both modules, the older one (in -09) will be picked up, unless there is an explicit reference by date. Please clarify what was the intention of backdating the model. Thanks Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanand...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
