The security considerations section is empty. Is it possible to have that updated before the WGLC?
I will try to review and provide more detailed comments. On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:58 AM <slitkows.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > This email starts a two-week working group last call for > draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01 [1] > > > > > > > > Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, > please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track > RFC. > > > > > > > > This poll runs until February 1st. > > > > > > > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to > this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > > > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from > all the Authors and Contributors. > > > > There is currently no IPR disclosed. > > > > In addition, we are polling for knowledge of implementations of this > draft, per the BESS policy in [2]. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Matthew & Stephane > > > > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility/ > > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!X5h4y9zD3js4IFT_XC9-diCFCY2KETdVMSaYYY3ihMfJkJT9ibnhUx4IgRXhv_vc$> > > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
