That sounds great, thanks Donald! David
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:34 PM Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Thanks for the review. See below. > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 4:44 PM David Schinazi via Datatracker > <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > Reviewer: David Schinazi > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > > like any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-04 > > Reviewer: David Schinazi > > Review Date: 2021-02-05 > > IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-16 > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > > > Summary: Thank you for a well-written document. > > It introduces a lot of terminology I wasn't used to, > > but does a good job of explaining it. > > > > Major issues: None > > > > Minor issues: None > > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > - The abstract defines all the acronyms (which is great) except PBB, > could it define that one too? > > - Section 2.1 doesn't really explain what a "P node" is. > > Sure, we can expand PBB (Provider Backbone Bridge) in the abstract and > say in Section 2.1 that P is Provider. These should probably also be > added to the terminology section. I've made these changes in the > working copy but they are pretty minor so I think I'll wait for the > results of other reviews before uploading a new version. > > Thanks, > Donald > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA > d3e...@gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
