Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. I support John Scudder's first DISCUSS point. Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated), and some nits. Thanks for Matthew Bocci for his shepherd's write-up (including the WG consensus). I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == -- Section 3 -- How will the GW identifiers be unique across all interconnected SR domains ? Section 9 is rather hand waving. -- Section 10 -- Is there any reason why the doc shepherd is not acknowledged ? == NITS == -- Section 1 -- s/against connection of device failure/against connection or device failure/ ? I find the use of "ingress" in "source (ingress)" confusing, should the reader assume that it is "source (SR-domain ingress)" ? _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
