Alvaro Thank you for the added piece of information. I am clearing my DISCUSS tomorrow (past midnight here).
Regards -éric -----Original Message----- From: iesg <iesg-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, 17 May 2021 at 23:34 To: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org>, Eric Vyncke <evyn...@cisco.com>, The IESG <i...@ietf.org> Cc: Matthew Bocci <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>, "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <manka...@cisco.com>, "bess-cha...@ietf.org" <bess-cha...@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperat...@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperat...@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Éric: Hi! MSDP (from 2003) is an IPv4-only protocol. Also, take a look at rfc4611/BCP121 (MSDP Deployment Scenarios) which mentions other IPv6 alternatives which makes any extension of MSDP unnecessary. Alvaro. On May 17, 2021 at 2:10:13 AM, Éric Vyncke wrote: > == DISCUSS == > While I am an expert neither in multicast not in VPN, I wonder why this > document is only about IPv4 and not a single word is written about IPv6. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess