Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I hope that I'm just misunderstanding something obvious, but I strongly support John's DISCUSS -- when SR was "approved" it was with the understanding that it would only be used within "real" limited domains, and would never be sent outside of closed/limited network. The document says: "The solution defined in this document can be seen in the broader context of SR domain interconnection in [I-D.farrel-spring-sr-domain-interconnect]. ", which says: " Traffic originating in one SR domain often terminates in another SR domain, but must transit a backbone network that provides interconnection between those domains." -- is it unclear to me if this is really what is being proposed... I'm hoping that I'm really misunderstanding something here -- please educate me. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
