Hi Authors, Please respond.
Thanks Rajesh Juniper Business Use Only From: Rajesh M <mrajesh=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 2:24 PM To: Rajesh M <mraj...@juniper.net>; dh...@cisco.com; swaag...@cisco.com; cfils...@cisco.com; ket...@cisco.com Cc: spr...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: RE: draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-02 [External Email. Be cautious of content] +bess working group Juniper Business Use Only From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Rajesh M Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 12:38 PM To: dh...@cisco.com<mailto:dh...@cisco.com>; swaag...@cisco.com<mailto:swaag...@cisco.com>; cfils...@cisco.com<mailto:cfils...@cisco.com>; ket...@cisco.com<mailto:ket...@cisco.com> Cc: spr...@ietf.org<mailto:spr...@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-02 [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi All, Have below query on BGP CAR draft section "2.9.2.3 SRv6 SID TLV" 1) why we are using Prefix-SID attribute ? The idea was omitting BGP Prefix SID Attribute from the color-aware routes for better BGP packing efficiency. 2) Which SID we are advertising in BGP Prefix SID Attribute ? Thanks Rajesh Juniper Business Use Only
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
